What is required for a solution to be considered "Suitable" in COA EVAL?

For a solution to be considered "suitable" in the context of Course of Action (COA) Evaluation, it is essential that the solution legally addresses and resolves the identified problem. This means the solution must adhere to laws, regulations, and ethical standards, ensuring that it is not only practical but also legitimate in the operational environment.

When a COA is deemed suitable, it signifies that it aligns with legal frameworks and requirements, which can be critical for the acceptance and implementation of the solution. A solution that does not legally solve the problem could lead to repercussions that undermine the overall effectiveness of the action being proposed. Therefore, ensuring that the solution meets legal criteria is a fundamental aspect of determining its suitability.

While other factors such as technical feasibility, distinctiveness from other options, and resource allocation can influence the evaluation of a solution, the primary criterion of legal and ethical conformity is what establishes whether a course of action is considered "suitable."